‹date/time›
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
No domain specific knowledge
Say something about the structural formulas
Logics are large:
Proof checker must be small.
Uses:  Logical framework
Shipment of proofs
Means formalization of proofs
Uniformity is important, since logic might change.  We do not want to invent a new proof checker for each logic we are trying, we are more interested in one Trustworthy proof checker.  We have one, the type checker for LF, expressive enough
Shipment of proofs
Means formalization of proofs
Uniformity is important, since logic might change.  We do not want to invent a new proof checker for each logic we are trying, we are more interested in one Trustworthy proof checker.  We have one, the type checker for LF, expressive enough
Shipment of proofs
Means formalization of proofs
Uniformity is important, since logic might change.  We do not want to invent a new proof checker for each logic we are trying, we are more interested in one Trustworthy proof checker.  We have one, the type checker for LF, expressive enough
Shipment of proofs
Means formalization of proofs
Uniformity is important, since logic might change.  We do not want to invent a new proof checker for each logic we are trying, we are more interested in one Trustworthy proof checker.  We have one, the type checker for LF, expressive enough
Shipment of proofs
Means formalization of proofs
Uniformity is important, since logic might change.  We do not want to invent a new proof checker for each logic we are trying, we are more interested in one Trustworthy proof checker.  We have one, the type checker for LF, expressive enough
No domain specific knowledge